Probably shouldn't call it "Open router" in the title as that's a specific brand. Maybe you meant "we built something like OpenRouter".

Rereading I see you wrote "open OpenRouter", which looks a bit like a typo at first glance.

Interesting but would be better if you didn't copy/paste AI generated text here. Also, the link seems to go to a tool and the "Python doesn't parse 6 certificates" is only a sidenote to the repo's main purpose. Either focus on one or the other, don't mix the 2. Your comment I'm replying to here mixes the 2 as well. The default path and open SSL fallback is irrelevant to the invalidity finding.

This is a useful finding. I don't think that they need to rephrase this.

Have you tried further fuzzing the ASN.1 parser?

What can coverage-guided fuzzing find if there is 100% test coverage?

Write tests for these to prevent regressions?

Why does the top card say "Intelligence #1/173" when the bar chart further down shows it only at position 7?

And the model isn't even shown in the speed bar chart just below. Such slop (the artificial intelligence website linked)

Not clear to me how it selects that, but it considers it to be #1 out of 173 models "of the same class".

I see, thanks, then it should state that in the card.

Possibly vitess from the latest update:

> primary failover briefly improved performance but did not fully mitigate, we've throttled inbound traffic and are investigating upstream Vitess issues

Thanks!

What's so bad about Dexcom and Freestyle compared to Medtronic CGMs?

There's a Bayesian forecast from some folks at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine that's useful to see if the outbreak has reached peak size: https://epiforecasts.io/BVDOutbreakSize/stable/analysis#Summ...

The last update finally had a growth rate confidence interval straggling 0, meaning the peak seems to be within reach: "The latest growth rate is estimated to be 30% -0.005–0.008"

There's a nice figure showing Rt over time: https://epiforecasts.io/BVDOutbreakSize/stable/analysis#Repr...

Newest run from 2026-08-25 shows Rt likely above 1 again unfortunately (percentages are confidence intervals): 30% 1.05–1.19, 60% 0.99–1.31, 90% 0.82–1.6. Daily growth rate: 30% 0.005–0.014, 60% -0.001–0.021, 90% -0.013–0.034 per day.

Here's a video of his ICM talk with the same name: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0--ZH1lOzg

The experiment in TFA is saturated so there's no signal there, unfortunately.

Agreed on the first experiment, that's why the post says it hit the ceiling. The others are not saturated. I'd love to find a way of making the first experiment more discriminating.

Yes here in FAQs:

Are paywalls ok?

It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds.

In comments, it's ok to ask how to read an article and to help other users do so. But please don't post complaints about paywalls. Those are off topic. More here

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html

Per HN Guideline "Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter.", this should be pointed at the original source: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10....

Also worth noting: Frontiers in Psychology is a low-impact journal.