Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Initial testing seems promising. 5.2 found a fair few issues in code generated by 5.1

Also seems much more determined to do things the "right" way. e.g. Saw hardcoded credentials and wanted to purge that from git history and integrate a vault into the project

Feels a little slower, but I suspect what I'm feeling is verbose thinking rather than slower raw tokens



I wonder how many issues 5.1 could have caught if you ran it as multiple adversarial reviews against the original output it gave you.


Well I did run deepseek against the original. They all seem seem to spot different issues




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: