Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

National security excuses enjoy widespread bipartisan support.

Want to execute a citizen without trial? National security.

Want to execute his child without trial? National security.

 help



[flagged]


GP already explicitly called it bipartisan, and it was bipartisan well before Obama (though if we're pointing fingers at a modern president for accelerating the abuse of "national security", it really should be Dubya).

It was literally Obama who did the things mentioned that had bipartisan support.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Abdulrahman_al-Awla...


[flagged]


Objectively, the courts ruled for Obama and against Trump. You can read the rulings to understand why.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: